One of the biggest misconceptions about my work is that it’s heavily edited, Photoshopped, or made using digital techniques. Some people assume the layers they see must be collaged or double-exposed.
In reality, what you’re seeing is exactly what was there.
Much of my work is based on reflections — glass, windows, surfaces that naturally create depth and layering. The complexity comes from observation, not manipulation. The more carefully you look, the more you can include in a single frame without any trickery at all.
When someone says, “I don’t get it,” I don’t try to convince them. I simply explain that this is what I saw when I slowed down and looked longer at a familiar place. Everything in the image existed naturally in that moment.
I don’t want to control how people interpret my work. In fact, I prefer the opposite. Abstract photography is meant to be open. I usually let people tell me what they see or feel before I explain where the image was taken. That conversation — the difference between intention and interpretation — is part of the artwork itself.
By keeping my process natural and honest, the work remains grounded in reality. It proves that abstract photography doesn’t need digital shortcuts to be powerful. Sometimes, all it takes is patience, curiosity, and a willingness to see more than what’s obvious.